<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://conservation.arizona.edu"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>conservation.arizona.edu - keystone species</title>
 <link>https://conservation.arizona.edu/research-categories/keystone-species</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) reintroduction can limit woody plant proliferation in grasslands</title>
 <link>https://conservation.arizona.edu/publication/black-tailed-prairie-dog-cynomys-ludovicianus-reintroduction-can-limit-woody-plant</link>
 <description>  &lt;h3 class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;
    Authors  &lt;/h3&gt;

  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-authors&quot;&gt;
    Sarah L. Hale  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-authors&quot;&gt;
    John L. Koprowski  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-authors&quot;&gt;
    Steven R. Archer  &lt;/div&gt;

  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-body&quot;&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;Tree and shrub proliferation has been widespread in grasslands worldwide, and has altered ecosystem function and wildlife habitat. Several causes have been proposed for the woody plant encroachment phenomenon. The widespread eradication of a native keystone herbivore in North American grasslands, the prairie dog (C&lt;em&gt;ynomys&lt;/em&gt; spp.), is one potential contributing factor that has received relatively little attention. We hypothesized prairie dogs would have historically suppressed woody plants by creating “browse traps” through their systematic clipping of vegetation. We tested this hypothesis by conducting surveys and experimentally manipulating shrub accessibility via exclosures and artificial saplings on and around recently reestablished black-tailed prairie dog (&lt;em&gt;Cynomys ludovicianus&lt;/em&gt;) colonies in southeastern Arizona, United States. Shrubs were common on the nascent colonies (mean ± SE = 132 ± 32.7 plants ha–1), but at substantially reduced densities compared to off colonies (305 ± 94.9 plants ha–1). Among branches placed on colonies to simulate “saplings” 89% were damaged within 3 days of “planting,” whereas those placed off colonies were virtually untouched. This was true for both a deciduous, N2-fixing shrub (velvet mesquite, &lt;em&gt;Prosopis velutina&lt;/em&gt;) and an evergreen non-N2-fixing shrub (creosote bush, &lt;em&gt;Larrea tridentata&lt;/em&gt;). Prairie dogs on newly established colonies did not extirpate woody plants over the time-frame of our study, but reduced their abundance and suppressed their growth, which would ostensibly prevent them from achieving dominance. Implications for extending the longevity of widely practiced “brush management” grassland restoration treatments are discussed in the context of perceptions of prairie dogs as rangeland pests. Prairie dogs represent an enigma in keystone conservation. Whereas the reintroduction of large or charismatic keystone species [e.g., sea otters (&lt;em&gt;Enhydra lutris&lt;/em&gt;)] are conducted to restore critical ecological function, reintroductions of other keystone species, such as gray wolves (&lt;em&gt;Canis lupus&lt;/em&gt;) and in our case, prairie dogs, are highly controversial. Our findings suggest reintroductions of this negatively perceived small herbivore could function as a tool to locally suppress woody plant proliferation that is widely regarded as an impediment to livestock production. Accordingly, prairie dogs could promote restoration efforts to re-establish and maintain habitat for grassland endemics while promoting biological diversity and other ecosystem services.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;h3 class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;
    Additional Information  &lt;/h3&gt;

  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-addinfo&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.00233&quot;&gt;Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;span class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;
    Date of publication:
  &lt;/span&gt;

  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-year inline&quot;&gt;
    &lt;span  property=&quot;dc:date&quot; datatype=&quot;xsd:dateTime&quot; content=&quot;2020-01-01T00:00:00-07:00&quot; class=&quot;date-display-single&quot;&gt;2020&lt;/span&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;h3 class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;
    Topics  &lt;/h3&gt;

  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-research-areas&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/keystone-species&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;keystone species&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-research-areas&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;/topics/browse-trap&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;browse trap&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-research-areas&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/grasslands&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;grasslands&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-research-areas&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;/topics/restoration-ecology&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;restoration ecology&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;h3 class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;
    Research Categories  &lt;/h3&gt;

  &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/behavioral-ecology&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;Behavioral Ecology&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/human-wildlife-conflict&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;Human Wildlife Conflict&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/natural-history&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;Natural History&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/threatened-and-endangered-species&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;Threatened and Endangered Species&lt;/a&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2020 20:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mmerrick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">300 at https://conservation.arizona.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Hale, S. L., J. L. Koprowski, and H. Hicks. 2013. Review of black-tailed prairie dog reintroduction strategies and site selection: Arizona reintroduction. In Gottfried, Gerald J.; Ffolliott, Peter F.; Gebow, Brooke S.; Eskew, Lane G.; Collins, Loa C., com</title>
 <link>https://conservation.arizona.edu/publication/hale-s-l-j-l-koprowski-and-h-hicks-2013-review-black-tailed-prairie-dog-reintroduction</link>
 <description>  &lt;h3 class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;
    Authors  &lt;/h3&gt;

  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-authors&quot;&gt;
    Sarah L. Hale   &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-authors&quot;&gt;
    John L. Koprowski  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-authors&quot;&gt;
    Holly Hicks   &lt;/div&gt;

  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-body&quot;&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;The black-tailed prairie dog (&lt;em&gt;Cynomys ludovicianus&lt;/em&gt;) was once widely distributed throughout the western United States; however, anthropogenic influences have reduced the species’ numbers to 2 percent of historical populations. Black-tailed prairie dogs are described as a keystone species in the grassland ecosystem, and provide many unique services, including burrows for other species (e.g. burrowing owls [&lt;em&gt;Athene cunicularia&lt;/em&gt;] and rattlesnakes [Crotalus spp.]), nutrient rich soil that, in turn, provides rich vegetationfor grazers, and food for many carnivores and birds of prey. Several efforts have been made to reestablishthis species to its historical range. In southeastern Arizona, a recent reintroduction effort was built upon work of scientists that identified potential suitable areas with characteristics similar to those of existing prairie dog colonies in Mexico. Prairie dogs were first translocated to the sites in 2008, and individuals still remain on the landscape today. We compare this to other reestablishment efforts, and provide suggestions on ways to increase success of future reintroductions.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;h3 class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;
    Additional Information  &lt;/h3&gt;

  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-addinfo&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/44452&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Review of Black-Tailed Prairie Dog Reintroduction Strategies and Site Selection: Arizona Reintroduction&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;span class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;
    Date of publication:
  &lt;/span&gt;

  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-year inline&quot;&gt;
    &lt;span  property=&quot;dc:date&quot; datatype=&quot;xsd:dateTime&quot; content=&quot;2013-01-01T00:00:00-07:00&quot; class=&quot;date-display-single&quot;&gt;2013&lt;/span&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;h3 class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;
    Topics  &lt;/h3&gt;

  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-research-areas&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/black-tailed-prairie-dog&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;black-tailed prairie dog&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-research-areas&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/keystone-species&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;keystone species&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-research-areas&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/population-reduction&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;population reduction&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-research-areas&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/reintroduction&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;reintroduction&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-research-areas&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/reestablishment&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;reestablishment&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 18:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>thackerk1</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">152 at https://conservation.arizona.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ecosystem-level effects of keystone species reintroduction: a literature review</title>
 <link>https://conservation.arizona.edu/publication/ecosystem-level-effects-keystone-species-reintroduction-literature-review</link>
 <description>  &lt;h3 class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;
    Authors  &lt;/h3&gt;

  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-authors&quot;&gt;
    Sarah L. Hale   &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-authors&quot;&gt;
    John L. Koprowski  &lt;/div&gt;

  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-body&quot;&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;The keystone species concept was introduced in 1969 in reference to top‐down regulation of communities by predators, but has expanded to include myriad species at different trophic levels. Keystone species play disproportionately large, important roles in their ecosystems, but human‐wildlife conflicts often drive population declines. Population declines have resulted in the necessity of keystone species reintroduction; however, studies of such reintroductions are rare. We conducted a literature review and found only 30 peer‐reviewed journal articles that assessed reintroduced populations of keystone species, and only 11 of these assessed ecosystem‐level effects following reintroduction. Nine of 11 publications assessing ecosystem‐level effects found evidence of resumption of keystone roles; however, these publications focus on a narrow range of species. We highlight the deficit of peer‐reviewed literature on keystone species reintroductions, and draw attention to the need for assessment of ecosystem‐level effects so that the presence, extent, and rate of ecosystem restoration driven by keystone species can be better understood.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;h3 class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;
    Additional Information  &lt;/h3&gt;

  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-addinfo&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/rec.12684&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Restoration Ecology&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;span class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;
    Date of publication:
  &lt;/span&gt;

  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-year inline&quot;&gt;
    &lt;span  property=&quot;dc:date&quot; datatype=&quot;xsd:dateTime&quot; content=&quot;2018-01-01T00:00:00-07:00&quot; class=&quot;date-display-single&quot;&gt;2018&lt;/span&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;h3 class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;
    Topics  &lt;/h3&gt;

  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-research-areas&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/ecosystem-restoration&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;ecosystem restoration&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-research-areas&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/keystone-species&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;keystone species&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-research-areas&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/reintroduction&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;reintroduction&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-research-areas&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/population-declines&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;population declines&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-research-areas&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/ecosystem-level-effects&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;ecosystem-level effects&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;h3 class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;
    Research Categories  &lt;/h3&gt;

  &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/population-ecology-0&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;Population Ecology&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/threatened-and-endangered-species&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;Threatened and Endangered Species&lt;/a&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 23:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>thackerk1</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">151 at https://conservation.arizona.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Kangaroo rat foraging in proximity to a colony of reintroduced black-tailed prairie dogs </title>
 <link>https://conservation.arizona.edu/publication/kangaroo-rat-foraging-proximity-colony-reintroduced-black-tailed-prairie-dogs</link>
 <description>  &lt;h3 class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;
    Authors  &lt;/h3&gt;

  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-authors&quot;&gt;
    Kirsten M. Fulgham  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-authors&quot;&gt;
    John L. Koprowski  &lt;/div&gt;

  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-body&quot;&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;We examined the indirect effects of reintroduced black-tailed prairie dogs (&lt;em&gt;Cynomys ludovicianus&lt;/em&gt;) on resident kangaroo rat (&lt;em&gt;Dipodomys&lt;/em&gt;) populations. We used the Giving-up Density theory to quantify kangaroo rat foraging on a black-tailed prairie dog colony vs. foraging near the colony edge or in the surrounding native habitat. This approach allowed us to assess the influence of black-tailed prairie dogs on kangaroo rat foraging activity. Our results showed a greater foraging preference off-colony in most seasons. Kangaroo rats visited off-colony feeding trays more frequently and collected a greater mean mass of seed as well. This indicated that kangaroo rats perceived the area off the prairie dog colony as having a lower foraging cost than the on-colony or colony edge locations. Our data suggest that from the perspective of the seed-eating kangaroo rat, the colony is not viewed as high quality habitat. Both prairie dogs and kangaroo rats have been described as keystone modifiers in grassland ecosystems. What impact the reintroduction and management of one keystone species might have on another keystone species deserves additional consideration as we attempt to restore arid grassland ecosystems.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;h3 class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;
    Additional Information  &lt;/h3&gt;

  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-addinfo&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;https://bioone.org/journals/The-Southwestern-Naturalist/volume-61/issue-3/0038-4909-61.3.194/Kangaroo-rat-foraging-in-proximity-to-a-colony-of-reintroduced/10.1894/0038-4909-61.3.194.short&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;The Southwestern Naturalist 61:194-202.&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;span class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;
    Date of publication:
  &lt;/span&gt;

  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-year inline&quot;&gt;
    &lt;span  property=&quot;dc:date&quot; datatype=&quot;xsd:dateTime&quot; content=&quot;2016-01-01T00:00:00-07:00&quot; class=&quot;date-display-single&quot;&gt;2016&lt;/span&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;h3 class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;
    Topics  &lt;/h3&gt;

  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-research-areas&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/reintroduction&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;reintroduction&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-research-areas&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/black-tailed-prairie-dog&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;black-tailed prairie dog&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-research-areas&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/kangaroo-rat&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;kangaroo rat&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-research-areas&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/giving-density-theory&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;Giving-up Density theory&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-research-areas&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/foraging&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;foraging&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;div class=&quot;field-uaqs-pub-research-areas&quot;&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/keystone-species&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;keystone species&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;h3 class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;
    Research Categories  &lt;/h3&gt;

  &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/behavioral-ecology&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;Behavioral Ecology&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;/research-categories/threatened-and-endangered-species&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;Threatened and Endangered Species&lt;/a&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 21:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>thackerk1</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">142 at https://conservation.arizona.edu</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
